2008 Presidential Campaign Blog

Blogs


  • 2024 Presidential Campaign Blog

    2020 Presidential Campaign Blog

    2016 Presidential Campaign Blog

    2012 Presidential Campaign Blog

    2008 Presidential Campaign Blog

    2004 Presidential Campaign Blog

Ad


Subscribe to this blog's feed

Ad


California February 5 Presidential Primary Election Results

California February 5 Presidential Primary Election Results

Posted by Mike on February 05, 2008 | Permalink

California February 5 Presidential Primary Election Frequently Asked Questions

California February 5 Presidential Primary Election Frequently Asked Questions

Below are answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about the February 5 Presidential Primary Election and the Secretary of State’s Election Night Results Viewer.

Primary and General Elections

Why is California holding its Presidential Primary Election in February and how does this election differ from the Direct Primary Election in June?
Senate Bill 113 (Calderon), Chapter 2, Statutes of 2007, created a February 5, 2008, Presidential Primary Election.  The election is limited to presidential primary candidates and, as required by California Constitution Article II, Sections 8 and 9, any initiative measure or referendum that qualifies in time for a statewide election ballot.  The primary election in June will include races for United States Congress, the California Legislature, and statewide ballot measures, and potentially local races depending on the community where you live.

What is the difference between the primary and general elections in California?
Primary elections are held to determine which nominee in each political party will represent the party in the general election.  Voters who are registered with a political party are eligible to vote only in that party’s primary election and not in any other party primary election.  Some political parties allow voters who are not registered with any political party – also known as “decline-to-state” voters – to vote in the party’s primary.  The winning candidate from each party moves on to the general election and all voters, regardless of their political party registration, are allowed to vote for any candidate on that ballot.

Which political parties are allowing decline-to-state voters to cast ballots in their primaries?
The Democratic and American Independent parties are allowing decline-to-state voters (voters who did not choose to affiliate with any political party) to cast ballots in their presidential primaries on February 5.

How are decline-to-state voters informed that they have the option of voting in some of the political party primaries on February 5?
Elections Code section 3205(b) requires local elections officials to mail all decline-to-state voters who are registered as permanent vote-by-mail voters a notice and application regarding voting in the primary election. The notice shall inform the voter that he or she may request a vote-by-mail ballot for a particular political party for the primary election if that party authorized decline-to-state voters to vote in their primary.

Elections Code section 13102 requires local elections officials to provide vote-by-mail and polling place voters with a nonpartisan ballot unless they ask for a ballot that would allow them to vote in a particular party’s primary. The law does not specify how local elections officials are to let decline-to-state voters know they have such an option.

How can I find out where my polling place is?
You can look up your polling place at http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_ppl.htm. If you can’t find your polling place, you are permitted to cast a provisional ballot at any polling place in the county in which you are registered to vote.

What is the difference between presidential “delegates” and “electors?”
Presidential candidates will be awarded a certain number of delegates based on how they finish in the February 5, 2008, Presidential Primary Election. Those delegates then participate in their party’s national convention. Electors are people who are members of the Electoral College and who will vote for President on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December (after the November 4, 2008, General Election).

How are presidential primary delegates awarded in each political party?
Each party awards its delegates differently according to their respective bylaws and statutes. For more information about the six different political parties in California, you can find out how to contact them directly at http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_f.htm.

Why are the presidential candidates not listed in the Secretary of State’s official Voter Information Guides?
Elections Code section 9084 specifies what information is to be included in the statewide official Voter Information Guides, and this statute does not make any reference to presidential candidates.

However, candidate statements are available at http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/cand_state/cand_statements.html.
Initiative and Referendum Measures

About the Secretary of State's Election Results Website

Why aren’t the vote totals for write-in candidates included on the Secretary of State’s website?
County elections officials must read and tabulate write-in votes by hand. This occurs after most votes are tallied for all the candidates listed on the ballot (after the semifinal official canvass period is completed).

Elections Code section 15375(c) requires county elections officials to report vote totals for write-in candidates to the Secretary of State 28 days after the election.

Why are some presidential candidates listed under more than one political party?
Presidential candidates are not required to be registered voters of the political party whose ballot they run on. More than one political party may request that a particular candidate be placed on their ballot. Both the Green and Peace & Freedom parties included Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney on their primary ballots.

Why are presidential candidates only compared to candidates from the same party, instead of being compared to all other candidates on one full list?
This is a primary election, not a general election. Candidate vote totals in other parties have no impact on each party’s nomination.

Why have some counties reported precincts and vote totals, while other counties have not reported any results?
Each county elections office processes its ballots differently. Elections Code section 15151 requires county elections officials to send their initial results to the Secretary of State’s office no more than two hours after they begin tallying the votes after polls close on election night. Elections offices continue to report results periodically until all precinct vote totals have been reported.

Why do some counties show no precincts having reported, yet they are reporting that votes have been counted?
Elections Code section 15101 allows voters to cast ballots up to 29 days before Election Day, and many voters do this by voting by mail. Elections Code section 15101 allows counties to begin opening vote-by-mail ballots up to seven business days before Election Day, but those results cannot be accessed or shared with the public until the polls close at 8:00 p.m. on Election Day.

Many elections officials choose to tally and report these early voted ballots first, instead of waiting for ballots or results to come in from the individual precincts. As a result, because no full precincts have been tallied and reported, the results from these early voted ballots that are reported to the Secretary of State’s website simply appear as raw vote totals because in this initial stage, they are not attributed to individual precincts.

What happens to vote-by-mail ballots that are not processed in advance of Election Day, including those that are dropped off at a polling place or county elections office on Election Day?
All valid vote-by-mail ballots that county elections officials determine have been cast by eligible voters are counted and included in the official election results. Elections Code sections 15375(c) and (e) give elections officials 28 days to complete this process for presidential primary candidates and gives county elections officials 35 days for statewide ballot measures. This time period is often referred to as the "official canvass."

When are provisional ballots counted?
Provisional ballots are those ballots cast by voters who believe they are registered to vote, but their names do not appear on the official voter registration list. Voters who believe the official voter registration list incorrectly lists their political party affiliation can also vote provisionally. Finally, voters who receive a vote-by-mail ballot but arrive at the polls requesting the opportunity to vote in person because they cannot locate their vote-by-mail ballot are asked to use a provisional ballot to ensure they do not cast two ballots. All provisional ballots that county elections officials determine have been cast by eligible voters are counted and added to the official vote tally.

Elections Code sections 15375(c) and (e) give elections officials 28 days to complete this process for presidential primary candidates and gives county elections officials 35

How does the Election Results Viewer determine what qualifies as a "close contest?"
A close contest is one in which there is less than a 2% difference between first and second place.

Will the results change after election night? If so, when will all of the election results be final and official?
Results will be updated after all provisional ballots and vote-by-mail ballots are tallied. Depending on the volume of these types of ballots, it may take many more days for county elections officials to verify voter records and determine if ballots have been cast by eligible voters. Furthermore, results may be adjusted based on the results of post-election manual tally processes, frequently referred to as post-election audit processes, that are required by law.

How often these results are updated will vary based on the size of each county and the process each local elections office uses to tally and report votes.

Elections Code section 15375(c) requires elections officials to report their final results for presidential primary candidates to the Secretary of State 28 days after Election Day, which for this election is March 4. Elections Code section 15375 (e) requires elections officials to report their final results for statewide ballot measures to the Secretary of State 35 days after Election Day, which for this election is March 11. This time period is often referred to as the "official canvass."

The Secretary of State then has four more days to certify the results of the election which, in this case, is March 8 for presidential primary candidates and March 15 for statewide ballot measures.

Posted by Mike on February 05, 2008 | Permalink

Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party Presidential Preference Ballot Results

Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party Presidential Preference Ballot Results

 

                                                     
CandidateTotalsPercentage
Joe Biden680.04%
Hillary Clinton5420431.62%
Chris Dodd160.01%
John Edwards8200.48%
Dennis Kucinich3210.19%
Barack Obama11480466.97%
Bill Richardson870.05%
Uncommitted10830.63%

 

Posted by Mike on February 05, 2008 | Permalink

Republican Party of Minnesota Presidential Preference Ballot Results

Republican Party of Minnesota Presidential Preference Ballot Results

 

                                         
Candidate TotalsPercentage
Mike Huckabee885020.14%
Alan Keyes2690.61%
John McCain959221.83%
Ron Paul674215.34%
Mitt Romney1832641.70%
Write-in1670.38%

 

Posted by Mike on February 05, 2008 | Permalink

Ron Paul Rally in Minneapolis, Minnesota Draws 4,000

Ron Paul Rally in Minneapolis, Minnesota Draws 4,000

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – Today, Republican presidential candidate and Texas Congressman addressed a crowd of approximately 4,000 veterans, students and supporters at Northrop Auditorium on the University of Minnesota campus.

“Dr. Paul’s message of freedom, peace and prosperity is resonating with voters here in Minnesota,” said Marianne Stebbins, Ron Paul 2008 state coordinator in Minnesota. “We are planning on a surprisingly strong finish here in the Land of a 10,000 Lakes.”

Northrop Auditorium

Posted by Mike on February 04, 2008 | Permalink

John McCain 2008 Launches New Television Ad: "Trust"

JOHN MCCAIN 2008 LAUNCHES NEW TELEVISION AD: "TRUST"

ARLINGTON, VA -- In response to Governor Mitt Romney's attacks today, U.S. Senator John McCain's presidential campaign today released a new television ad. The ad, entitled "Trust," highlights Romney's history of running against the Reagan record and asks, "If we can't trust Mitt Romney on Ronald Reagan, how can we trust him to lead America?"

As conservative columnist Debra Saunders recently wrote, "Don't tell me Romney is the true conservative in the race. His record reveals a solid conservative -- when it has been in his interest to be one. In 1994, when he was running to unseat Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy, Romney supported abortion rights [and] distanced himself from Ronald Reagan ..."

"Trust" will run on national cable.

Script For "Trust" (:30-TV)

JOHN MCCAIN: I'm John McCain and I approve this message.

ANNCR: Mitt Romney on Ronald Reagan

CHYRON: Mitt Romney on Ronald Reagan

MITT ROMNEY: Look, I was an Independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.

CHYRON: In 1994 He Ran Against the Reagan Record

ANNCR: Mitt Romney was against Ronald Reagan before he was for him

CHYRON: Mitt Romney Was Against Ronald Reagan

CHYRON: Before He Was For Him

MITT ROMNEY: Yeah, I voted in the Democratic Primary. ... When I was running in 94, I wasn't trying to return to Reagan-Bush.

CHYRON: In 1992 He Voted for Liberal Democrat Paul Tsongas for President

ANNCR: If we can't trust Mitt Romney on Ronald Reagan, how can we trust him to lead America?

CHYRON: If We Can't Trust Mitt Romney on Ronald Reagan

CHYRON: How Can We Trust Him to Lead America?

MITT ROMNEY: I'm not running as the Republican view or a continuation of Republican values.

Posted by Mike on February 04, 2008 | Permalink

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Posted by Mike on February 04, 2008 | Permalink

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Ron Paul University Of Minnesota Photos

Posted by Mike on February 04, 2008 | Permalink

DNCC Names Level 3 Official Live Video and Content Delivery Services Provider for 2008 Democratic National Convention

DNCC NAMES LEVEL 3 OFFICIAL LIVE VIDEO AND CONTENT DELIVERY SERVICES PROVIDER FOR 2008 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION
Colorado-Based Communications Company to Provide Live, High-Definition, Gavel-to-Gavel Streaming Coverage

DENVER - The Democratic National Convention Committee (DNCC) and Colorado-based Level 3 Communications (NASDAQ: LVLT) announced today that Level 3 has been named as the Official Live Video and Content Delivery Services Provider for the 2008 Democratic National Convention, to be held Aug. 25-28, in Denver. In that role, Level 3 will provide video broadcast services, as well as online video downloading and live streaming of the four-day event, including speeches and other Convention content, via the Internet at www.DemConvention.com.

"We often talk about our commitment to bringing down the walls of the Pepsi Center by using technology and other tools to bring more people in to our Convention experience than ever before," said Leah D. Daughtry, CEO of the DNCC. "Level 3 moves us one giant step closer to that goal. Their video broadcast and live streaming capabilities will provide millions of people around the world with an all-access pass to this historic event next August."

As the Official Live Video and Content Delivery Services Provider, Level 3 will deliver live analog and High-Definition (HD) video broadcast services from the Pepsi Center, site of the 2008 Democratic National Convention. In addition, the DNCC will use Level 3's Content Delivery Network (CDN) to provide online video downloading and live streaming of the Convention. Level 3's CDN will also cache the Convention's web site on servers across its network to deliver a high-quality, online viewing experience. Together, these services will enable a global audience to access and view Convention content as best suits their needs, using the Internet-enabled device of their choice.

"The emergence of video and other rich media over the Internet has introduced a new era of communications that moves beyond traditional voice and Internet services," said Brady Rafuse, president of Level 3's Content Markets Group. "Today, greater online information access and two-way interactivity are reshaping election politics and providing more people with a voice than ever before. The 2008 Democratic National Convention marks an important milestone in the current presidential election and offers a unique opportunity for Level 3 to support the DNCC, the community and the nation by providing the video and content delivery services to enable a new standard in communications."

In working with the DNCC, Level 3 brings a proven track record of providing video broadcast services in support of political conventions, elections and other live events, such as the Super Bowl. Over the past decade, Level 3 has also served as the underlying provider of video transmission capabilities for each of the major television networks to broadcast the annual State of the Union address.

The 2008 Democratic National Convention is expected to pump an estimated $160 million into the Denver area's economy and draw approximately 35,000 visitors to the region.

Posted by Mike on February 04, 2008 | Permalink

State Auditor Rebecca Otto, Other Prominent Women Leaders Endorse Senator Barack Obama For President

State Auditor Rebecca Otto, Other Prominent Women Leaders Endorse Senator Barack Obama for President

MINNEAPOLIS – Minnesota State Auditor Rebecca Otto announced her endorsement of Senator Barack Obama for President today at a press conference at the Minneapolis Woman's Club. The event was attended by several other prominent Minnesota women elected officials.

“Senator Obama has a proven record of service to women and families, on issues ranging from health care, safeguarding the environment, improving our education system, providing equal rights, and ensuring reproductive health,” Otto said. “He will provide uncommon vision and leadership in the White House benefiting women for generations to come.”

Other women leaders who have endorsed Senator Obama:

State Senator Ellen Anderson
State Senator Mee Moua
State Senator Patricia Torres Ray
State Representative Maria Ruud
State Representative Sandy Wollschlager
St. Paul Public School Teacher Kim Ellison
Minneapolis City Council Member Elizabeth Glidden
Minneapolis City Council Member Betsy Hodges
St. Paul City Council Member Toni Carter
Falcon Heights Council Member Beth Mercer-Taylor

“I am honored to have the endorsement of Rebecca Otto and all of these distinguished women leaders," Obama said. "I look forward to working with them to bring change we can believe in to Washington to promote fairness and equality for women and their families. We don't just want to win an election, we want to build a coalition that will finally solve the problems we've been talking about for decades.”

Posted by Mike on February 03, 2008 | Permalink

« Previous | Next »

2008 Candidates

  • General
    Barack Obama McCain Palin
  • Republicans
    John McCain Mitt Romney Rudy Giuliani Fred Thompson Mike Huckabee Ron Paul Duncan Hunter Tom Tancredo Sam Brownback Tommy Thompson Jim Gilmore
  • Democrats
    Barack Obama Joe Biden Hillary Clinton John Edwards Chris Dodd Bill Richardson Dennis Kucinich Mike Gravel Tom Vilsack

Categories

  • 2008 DNC Convention (43)
  • 2008 GOP Convention (137)
  • 2008 Poll (7)
  • 2008 Presidential Campaign (100)
  • 2012 (2)
  • Alan Keyes (4)
  • Barack Obama (374)
  • Bill Frist (4)
  • Bill Richardson (104)
  • Bob Barr (3)
  • Books (2)
  • Chris Dodd (90)
  • Chuck Hagel (3)
  • Coins (10)
  • Debates (145)
  • Democratic National Committee (27)
  • Dennis Kucinich (13)
  • Duncan Hunter (22)
  • Electoral College (4)
  • Evan Bayh (3)
  • Film (1)
  • Fred Thompson (81)
  • George Pataki (1)
  • Gerald Ford (2)
  • Hillary Clinton (333)
  • Howard Dean (2)
  • Inauguration (18)
  • Iowa (1)
  • Iowa 2008 (47)
  • Jim Gilmore (13)
  • Joe Biden (77)
  • John Cox (4)
  • John Edwards (169)
  • John Kerry (7)
  • John McCain (648)
  • Mark Warner (2)
  • Mike Gravel (3)
  • Mike Huckabee (93)
  • Minnesota Politics (154)
  • Mitt Romney (324)
  • Newt Gingrich (1)
  • Podcasting (2)
  • Presidential Campaign 2000 TV Ads (1)
  • Presidential Campaign History (207)
  • Presidential Campaign TV Ads (379)
  • Ralph Nader (5)
  • Religion (1)
  • Republican National Committee (38)
  • Ron Paul (50)
  • Rudy Giuliani (194)
  • Russ Feingold (1)
  • Sam Brownback (45)
  • Tom Tancredo (20)
  • Tom Vilsack (21)
  • Tommy Thompson (34)
  • Web Sites (57)
  • Web/Tech (10)
  • Weblogs (1)
  • Wes Clark (2)
  • White House (4)
  • Wisconsin (5)
See More

Recent Posts

  • New 2012 Presidential Campaign Blog Feed
  • Mike Huckabee Wins Values Voter Summit Straw Poll
  • 56th Inauguration Features NASA Astronauts, Lunar Rover, Panoramic Photos and Live Twitter
  • President Obama's Inaugural Address Speech Text
  • Change has come to WhiteHouse.gov, The New White House Website Is Live
  • Live Streaming Video Of The Inauguration Of Barack Obama
  • Presidential Inaugural Committee Releases Planned Order of Inaugural Parade
  • The Presidential Inaugural Committee (PIC) Unveils Interactive Web Tools To Bring Neighborhoods Together For The Neighborhood Inaugural Ball
  • Microsoft Silverlight Selected By Presidential Inaugural Committee To Enable Online Video Streaming Of Inauguration Events
  • President Obama to Christen New Cadillac Presidential Limousine

Ad